• Join ccmfans.net

    ccmfans.net is the Central Coast Mariners fan community, and was formed in 2004, so basically the beginning of time for the Mariners. Things have changed a lot over the years, but one thing has remained constant and that is our love of the Mariners. People come and go, some like to post a lot and others just like to read. It's up to you how you participate in the community!

    If you want to get rid of this message, simply click on Join Now or head over to https://www.ccmfans.net/community/register/ to join the community! It only takes a few minutes, and joining will let you post your thoughts and opinions on all things Mariners, Football, and whatever else pops into your mind. If posting is not your thing, you can interact in other ways, including voting on polls, and unlock options only available to community members.

    ccmfans.net is not only for Mariners fans either. Most of us are bonded by our support for the Mariners, but if you are a fan of another club (except the Scum, come on, we need some standards), feel free to join and get into some banter.

R9: CCM v WSW

Tevor

Well-Known Member
I only saw it live so missed all the small details, suggest CGJ blow the whistle almost immediately therefore Borda gets off. Sure there are some replays but I think everyone focused on the collision not what happened afterwards.
 

dibo

Well-Known Member
As long as the whistle has gone, play stops.

If, after the whistle, someone commits a red card offence that isn't part of the play (e.g. violent conduct, spitting, offensive/insulting language or gestures) then they can be punted for that, but other than that the play has stopped so the goal couldn't have been awarded.
 

pjennings

Well-Known Member
Thanks - not sure the whistle had gone. He seemed to take an age and then another age to decide on the red.
 

bikinigirl

Well-Known Member
. now PJ has piqued my interest ... could somebody answer his question assuming the whistle hadn't been blown?

. that is, could they both have been sent off? whether they actually would have is irrelevant

. i would assume in this scenario ... red card offence, advantage played, second red card offence - once play is stopped both cards are issued?
 

Tevor

Well-Known Member
Yes the ref could issue two reds, one offence does not stop others from occurring should advantage be played. It all happened so quick and everybody focused on the collision IMO because it was definitely an issue that had to be dealt with.
 

dibo

Well-Known Member
But the send off was for denying an obvious goalscoring opportunity. Would it have been denied if another person shot? Surely then the red card only goes to the second player?
 

nebakke

Well-Known Member
But the send off was for denying an obvious goalscoring opportunity. Would it have been denied if another person shot? Surely then the red card only goes to the second player?

Are you sure? Bear in mind that that is not an automatic red anymore... I thought (and hope) that the send-off was for the insane tackle?
 

dibo

Well-Known Member
It's only not an automatic red in the area, and then only if there's a genuine play on the ball. Outside the red still comes out.
 

Online statistics

Members online
34
Guests online
713
Total visitors
747

Forum statistics

Threads
6,742
Messages
383,889
Members
2,715
Latest member
ForzaFred
Top