• Join ccmfans.net

    ccmfans.net is the Central Coast Mariners fan community, and was formed in 2004, so basically the beginning of time for the Mariners. Things have changed a lot over the years, but one thing has remained constant and that is our love of the Mariners. People come and go, some like to post a lot and others just like to read. It's up to you how you participate in the community!

    If you want to get rid of this message, simply click on Join Now or head over to https://www.ccmfans.net/community/register/ to join the community! It only takes a few minutes, and joining will let you post your thoughts and opinions on all things Mariners, Football, and whatever else pops into your mind. If posting is not your thing, you can interact in other ways, including voting on polls, and unlock options only available to community members.

    ccmfans.net is not only for Mariners fans either. Most of us are bonded by our support for the Mariners, but if you are a fan of another club (except the Scum, come on, we need some standards), feel free to join and get into some banter.

World Cup qualifying- CONCACAF preview

David Votoupal

Well-Known Member
March 28-
Trinidad & Tobago v Honduras
Mexico v Costa Rica
El Salvador v USA

April 1-
USA v Trinidad & Tobago
Honduras v Mexico
Costa Rica v El Salvador

USA and Costa Rica got off to the perfect start, with El Salvador coming from behind to salvage a point. Mexico need to get their campaign off the mark now, while El Salvador could prove tricky for the USA. A harder group than one might imagine, except that the 4th-placed side will provide supposed cannon fodder for South America's 5th-placed side.
 

David Votoupal

Well-Known Member
Mexico 2 Costa Rica 0
Trinidad & Tobago 1 Honduras 1
El Salvador USA 2

Mexico get their first win of the stage, Honduras concede a last minute equaliser while El Salvador went 2-0 up before choking.
 

Omni

Well-Known Member
USA blew that though, they're miles ahead of everyone that isn't Mexico, and they're still better than Mexico, mind you that's the beauty of CONCACAF you can still blow a few games and advance, there's that many spots! Until the MLS has international breaks this will happen, seriously MLS starting your season before a world cup qualifier????

TNT are in a bit of trouble and the USA will be dissapointed at their dropping points, I think poor TNT could get pumped on Wednesday.
 

David Votoupal

Well-Known Member
CONCACAF is seen as a group that rewards mediocrity, since the USA, Mexico and Costa Rica are guaranteed a free ride in these days, and the 4th-placed side gets a double chance- although this time it's against a South American team, making it highly unlikely that a team like Trinidad & Tobago will repeat their '06 heroics.

That being said, there isn't much real difference between CONCACAF and Asia in terms of actual quality. Their performances at the last World Cup were no different. Kind of a glass houses thing when we go on about how many spots they get.
 

northernspirit

Well-Known Member
concacaf should have 2.5 spots really not 3.5
that extra spot should go to asia - for a continent with countries the populations of china, india, indonesia, japan and so on... the numbers are disproportionate, like COMNEBOL too - basically half of the teams competing can qualify for the w.c - where as asia has 3 qualifying sections for only 4.5 teams in total
 

David Votoupal

Well-Known Member
northernspirit said:
concacaf should have 2.5 spots really not 3.5
that extra spot should go to asia - for a continent with countries the populations of china, india, indonesia, japan and so on... the numbers are disproportionate, like COMNEBOL too - basically half of the teams competing can qualify for the w.c - where as asia has 3 qualifying sections for only 4.5 teams in total

With all due respect, for all the population of Asia, the continent is still weaker in footballing terms than most- no better than CONCACAF and not with the sheer depth of talent and competitive sides that Africa has.

CONCACAF has a long history and tradition. Mexico and most of Central America (Costa Rica, Honduras, El Salvador, Guatemala, Panama) have established football culture, passion and raw talent in abundance. Caribbean nations like Jamaica and Trinidad & Tobago also have passion for the game and can call upon European-based professionals, and even the smaller island nations can tap into the gene pool of talent due to their British links- thus making them stronger than Oceania or even Asian minnows.

In Asia, the diversity and disparities of the confederation are reflected in the football, and the gap between the top sides of the region and the rest is still much bigger. It's improving, admittedly, but it's not at the level of Europe, South America or Africa where any team can go into games with a realistic chance of points.

That there's been some real shellackings in the ACL in the past few years- Gamba won 15-0 over a Vietnamese side- would drive that point home too.
 

Omni

Well-Known Member
I agree that CONCACAF have a much better tradition than Asia, however, AFC has more depth.

Keep in mind that in the AFC at least one of North Korea, South Korea, Iran & Saudia Arabia will miss out on qualification, however in CONCACAF at least one of Costa Rica, El Salvador, TNT & Honduras WILL qualify. It's what intregued me about the OFC debate, why was it always talk about taking a South American spot, surely a better pitch would have been for a CONCACAF spot. It's what makes this proposal about the USA wanting to move to CONMEBOL all the more bizzare, why would you give up such a sure thing?

The ACL example is a poor one - there's been some real thumpings in the UCL as well does that mean UEFA is rubbish?
 

marinermick

Well-Known Member
Omni said:
I agree that CONCACAF have a much better tradition than Asia, however, AFC has more depth.

Keep in mind that in the AFC at least one of North Korea, South Korea, Iran & Saudia Arabia will miss out on qualification, however in CONCACAF at least one of Costa Rica, El Salvador, TNT & Honduras WILL qualify. It's what intregued me about the OFC debate, why was it always talk about taking a South American spot, surely a better pitch would have been for a CONCACAF spot. It's what makes this proposal about the USA wanting to move to CONMEBOL all the more bizzare, why would you give up such a sure thing?

The ACL example is a poor one - there's been some real thumpings in the UCL as well does that mean UEFA is rubbish?

CONCACAF has one Jack Warner in their corner who is one of the biggest shaker and mover at FIFA.
 

Omni

Well-Known Member
The US would qualify if CONCACAF had 1.5 spots IMO, they've been all over Mexico in recent years. Jack Warner is certainly a much bigger reason, could be the clincher for a CONCACAF World Cup.
 

David Votoupal

Well-Known Member
Omni said:
I agree that CONCACAF have a much better tradition than Asia, however, AFC has more depth.

Keep in mind that in the AFC at least one of North Korea, South Korea, Iran & Saudia Arabia will miss out on qualification, however in CONCACAF at least one of Costa Rica, El Salvador, TNT & Honduras WILL qualify. It's what intregued me about the OFC debate, why was it always talk about taking a South American spot, surely a better pitch would have been for a CONCACAF spot. It's what makes this proposal about the USA wanting to move to CONMEBOL all the more bizzare, why would you give up such a sure thing?

The ACL example is a poor one - there's been some real thumpings in the UCL as well does that mean UEFA is rubbish?

On the same scale as what Gamba and Kashima managed, as recently as last year? Even one of the Thai sides managed to put 9 past a Vietnamese side.

In Asia, the quality does drop off once you get past the best dozen or so teams, and you have many countries that are under-developed or almost undeveloped in a football sense with no chance at all of improvement. That from a 45 or so member confederation with an enormous population base.

If we look at World Cup performances in 2006:
- Japan, Iran and Saudi Arabia all finished bottom of their groups, and only Australia made it to the next round.
- USA, Costa Rica and Trinidad & Tobago all finished bottom of their groups and only Mexico made it to the next round. However, T&T did hold Sweden to a 0-0 draw and held England off for 83 minutes... while the USA drew with the eventual champions.
 

FFC Mariner

Well-Known Member
Small sides giving England a run for their money at the WC is not a v reliable guage of their ability.

There is always a 1-0 or 0-0 against some tiny country before we make our traditional QF exit after extra time, penalties amid tears and heartbreak
 

marinermick

Well-Known Member
FFC Mariner said:
Small sides giving England a run for their money at the WC is not a v reliable guage of their ability.

There is always a 1-0 or 0-0 against some tiny country before we make our traditional QF exit after extra time, penalties amid tears and heartbreak

exactly, everyone knows that italy start their world cup campaign very slowly
 

FFC Mariner

Well-Known Member
And Ze Chermans too.

Thing is, those bastards more than likely will win it - going out in the QF's not good enough for them oh no
 

Omni

Well-Known Member
David Votoupal said:
Omni said:
I agree that CONCACAF have a much better tradition than Asia, however, AFC has more depth.

Keep in mind that in the AFC at least one of North Korea, South Korea, Iran & Saudia Arabia will miss out on qualification, however in CONCACAF at least one of Costa Rica, El Salvador, TNT & Honduras WILL qualify. It's what intregued me about the OFC debate, why was it always talk about taking a South American spot, surely a better pitch would have been for a CONCACAF spot. It's what makes this proposal about the USA wanting to move to CONMEBOL all the more bizzare, why would you give up such a sure thing?

The ACL example is a poor one - there's been some real thumpings in the UCL as well does that mean UEFA is rubbish?

On the same scale as what Gamba and Kashima managed, as recently as last year? Even one of the Thai sides managed to put 9 past a Vietnamese side.

In Asia, the quality does drop off once you get past the best dozen or so teams, and you have many countries that are under-developed or almost undeveloped in a football sense with no chance at all of improvement. That from a 45 or so member confederation with an enormous population base.

If we look at World Cup performances in 2006:
- Japan, Iran and Saudi Arabia all finished bottom of their groups, and only Australia made it to the next round.
- USA, Costa Rica and Trinidad & Tobago all finished bottom of their groups and only Mexico made it to the next round. However, T&T did hold Sweden to a 0-0 draw and held England off for 83 minutes... while the USA drew with the eventual champions.

I don't understand how that shoots down my point. You say "AFC drops off after the first dozen" that only works if there are 13 good sides in CONCACAF, there's 2 USA & Mexico and then a BIG gap to Costa Rica where as in AFC you have Australia, Japan, South Korea, Saudi Arabia, Iran and an improving North Korea.

I'm not complaining about the US getting in so easily, given I'll be living there they'll no doubt become an NT I support, so whatever, the other really crazy thing about the CONCACAF is that the USA & Mexico both have to start at the 2nd stage and thump some poor nation over two legs that is completely stupid.
 

Omni

Well-Known Member
Honduras 3 Mexico 1!!!!!!

Mexico in 4th 1W 2L - at least they've already played the US once.
 

Online statistics

Members online
30
Guests online
613
Total visitors
643

Forum statistics

Threads
6,739
Messages
382,891
Members
2,715
Latest member
ForzaFred
Top