• Join ccmfans.net

    ccmfans.net is the Central Coast Mariners fan community, and was formed in 2004, so basically the beginning of time for the Mariners. Things have changed a lot over the years, but one thing has remained constant and that is our love of the Mariners. People come and go, some like to post a lot and others just like to read. It's up to you how you participate in the community!

    If you want to get rid of this message, simply click on Join Now or head over to https://www.ccmfans.net/community/register/ to join the community! It only takes a few minutes, and joining will let you post your thoughts and opinions on all things Mariners, Football, and whatever else pops into your mind. If posting is not your thing, you can interact in other ways, including voting on polls, and unlock options only available to community members.

    ccmfans.net is not only for Mariners fans either. Most of us are bonded by our support for the Mariners, but if you are a fan of another club (except the Scum, come on, we need some standards), feel free to join and get into some banter.

Mariners Squad - 2020-2021

turbo

Well-Known Member
Realistically we should definitely be considering him - might come down to if he overstates his value or not.

Ideally we'd still be looking for a 2nd reasonable striker if so (I'm guessing he'd take the pay packet of a 'gun' striker
I would say he should be taking the 2nd reasonable striker pay packet (which is also where Simon should be if he stays on) rather than the gun one. Brisbane let him go, jets let him go - we shouldn't be suckered in to offering top dollar.
 

Capn Gus Bloodbeard

Well-Known Member
I would say he should be taking the 2nd reasonable striker pay packet (which is also where Simon should be if he stays on) rather than the gun one. Brisbane let him go, jets let him go - we shouldn't be suckered in to offering top dollar.
He would be our first striker..though i suppose our first striker pay packet will always be another teams 2nd striker pay packet!
 

turbo

Well-Known Member
If he's playing for us, I can live with it.
Doubt he'd be prepared to play for what we would want to pay
He might not have a lot of options. I can't see him being anyone's first choice striker after the jets cut him loose and age catches everyone sooner or later.
 

Rising Sun

Well-Known Member
Roux is a nice guy - but should not even be entertained as an option. He is an outright defensive liability.
Agree.

But I would also be looking at shaping our tactics around our strengths and would give serious consideration to playing 3 centre backs next season.

If we did that, then I would not be opposed to Roux (if he was at his best and at the right price) in a wing back role.
 

nikko

Suspended
Roux is a nice guy - but should not even be entertained as an option. He is an outright defensive liability.
Mate, he is a nice guy to everyone at the club.
Just like 50cent is nice to everyone in the nightclub because he only has 50cent to spend on drinks.
Roux is nice to all the punters in the nightclub because he wants to get on the piss in the cheapest way possible
 

BrisRecky

I'm an idiot savant without the pesky savant bit
So, question, is there no legal way that Pikey can be forced to spend all the cap on the team ?…like can Paramount demand he do it or something ?
 

Online statistics

Members online
18
Guests online
527
Total visitors
545

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
6,729
Messages
380,616
Members
2,716
Latest member
ForzaFred
Top